Sunday, September 6, 2015

2.11 Evaluation of Social Media Sources

First Source-Top 10 Controversies About The US
  • Credibility - Can you corroborate who the person who posted the social media message is. Can you Google them? Do they belong to an organization or institution that bestows credibility on them (for example, a university, governmental organization, non-profit, company, etc.)?I tried to Google the writer and to no avail did not find him to be credible in my opinion. This site Listverve solicits lists sent to them by readers and pays them $100. .

  • Location - Are they in the place they are tweeting or posting about? Are they directly involved with any of the events relevant to your controversy? I believe they are based in the United Kingdom from what I observe from the site.
  • Network - Who is in their network and who follows them? Do other individuals with institutional credibility associate with this person on social media? The BBC Radio, Radio Scotland, Alabama Radio, BBC Television World News International, PBS, Gizmodo, and the New York Time are where Listverse articles are featured as well as on the cover. pages of popular social networking sites.

  • Content - Can the information they’re relying on in their tweet or post be corroborated from other sources? I am somewhat skeptical about this site and do not believe in its reliability.
  • Contextual updates - Do they usually post or tweet on this topic? If so, what did past or updated posts say? Do they fill in more details?They typical post three list serves day.
  • Age - What is the age of the account in question? Be wary of recently created accounts. From what I have read the ages range would be mid 30's. Their site states that they also post about trivia.

  • Reliability - Is the source of information reliable? I do not believe in the reliability of the source because of the credibility.
2nd Source- Jobs and the Economy
  • Credibility - Can you corroborate who the person who posted the social media message is. Can you Google them? Do they belong to an organization or institution that bestows credibility on them (for example, a university, governmental organization, non-profit, company, etc.)? San Diego Union Tribune where the article was posted is reliable source where the articles is posted but the writers whom are the co-founders of Luxuria Relations this business site which I googled was not in service. Only last names of the two co-founders where posted.
  • Location - Are they in the place they are tweeting or posting about? Are they directly involved with any of the events relevant to your controversy? Not sure their article is posted in the San Diego Union Tribune.

  • Network - Who is in their network and who follows them? Do other individuals with institutional credibility associate with this person on social media? Their typical followers could be subscribers of the San Diego Union Tribune.

  • Content - Can the information they’re relying on in their tweet or post be corroborated from other sources?

  • Contextual updates - Do they usually post or tweet on this topic? If so, what did past or updated posts say? Do they fill in more details?

  • Age - What is the age of the account in question? Be wary of recently created accounts. The San Diego Union Tribune is a well known publication and the age of the writers are questionable due to only their last names are credited.
  •  Reliability - Is the source of information reliable? The writers are the cofounders of Luxuria Relations. Website is not functioning when I googled.

Storify RamirezCAR

No comments:

Post a Comment